Comparative Study of the Kimberlites of Bakwanga (North Group) and Bakwa-Kalonji (South Group) In East Kasai, Democratic Republic of Congo.

Onya Ngila Arnold; Kampata Mbwelele Dona; Koy Kasongo Ruben; Cibumba Cibumba Alain; Fwani Pambu  Chamira; Kisambu Thigana Déogracias; Djonive Munene

doi:10.14232/analecta.2025.2.21-33

Authors

Onya Ngila Arnold University of Kinshasa
Kampata Mbwelele Dona University of Kinshasa
Koy Kasongo Ruben University of Kinshasa https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9147-5460
Cibumba Cibumba Alain University of Kinshasa
Fwani Pambu Chamira National remote sensing Center (CNT), Kinshasa, D.R. Congo
Kisambu Thigana Déogracias University of Kinshasa
Djonive Munene University of Kinshasa https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1640-9216

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14232/analecta.2025.2.21-33

Keywords:

Kimberlitic massif, magmatism, petrology

Abstract

The presence of kimberlites in the Democratic Republic of Congo has been known since buttgenbach reported a typical ‘yellow ground’ in Katanga as early as 1908, and prospecting work before and after 1914 had already identified twenty-four pipes in the province. In eastern Kasai, the local Kimberlite, which crosses the entire Precambrian (Socle and its overburden) as well as the sandstone Mesozoic and is covered by the Tertiary, is found in two groups, namely the Northern Group, also known as the Bakwanga Kimberlites, and the Southern Group, known as the Bakwa-Kalonji Kimberlites. With the same age, dated to the Cretaceous and quantified at 71.3 million years, a comparative scientific study of the two groups of kimberlites in East Kasai is of interest in order to gain an insight into the primitive magmatism that created them. To this end, we have set ourselves the objective of taking stock of geochemical knowledge of the Bakwanga and Bakwa-Kalonji kimberlite massifs (accessible to our sampling) in order to better interpret and compare, from a petrological point of view, the genesis, composition and nature of these kimberlite intrusions.Based on our studies, we found that the Kimberlitic formations studied (Bakwanga and Tshibwe Kimberlite) are all characteristic of ultrabasic (or silica-undersaturated), mafic and not ultramafic, hyperalkaline, ultrapotassic, volatile-rich (H₂O and CO₂) magmatism of the lamproite or orangite group, showing clear crustal alteration or contamination and originating in the upper mantle. These two groups differ in terms of the lithology of the host rock (limestone and/or dolomite for the northern group and sandstone for the southern group). In terms of the proportion of xenoliths in the respective kimberlites, there is a total absence of sedimentary xenoliths, particularly limestone and dolomite, and incidentally sandstone, in the southern kimberlites. Gabbro-dioritic xenoliths are more abundant in the southern group than in the north, and xenoliths from basement rocks are more abundant and dominant in the north than in the south.)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Abréal, A. Les Grenats des dykes diamantifères, J.of Pers, Canadian Mineralogist,(2010).v13,132-147.

[2] Mvuemba Ntanda. Minéralogie des mégacristaux, des xénolithes éclogitiques et granulitiques et des inclusions minérales dans les diamants provenant de la kimberlite du kasai oriental (Congo) ; Thèse, MIG, Univ.Cath. Louvain – la – Neuve, (1980) 285P,

[3] Fieremans, Demaiffe et ottenburgs: Strontium-isotopic geochemistry of the Mbuji Mayi and Kundelungu kimberlites (Zaire, Central Africa) (1979) .

[4] De Wit. M.J. ,Michiel C.J., et Hielke, A.J. A Review of the Kimberlites of the Democratic Republic of Congo, Canadian mineralogist, (2015). v17, 361-369.

[5] Polinard, E. La géographie physique de la région du Lubilash, de la Bushimaie et de la Lubi vers le 6e parallèle Sud. Mém. Inst. Roy. Col. Belge, sc.nat. et méd. (1935), in-4°, 4, 1, 31pp.

[6] Focan, A. et W. Mullenders. saisons et périodes sèches et plusieurs au Congo Belge, Publ. INEAC. (1955).55 p.

[7] Robert M. Le Congo physique 3ème édition H. Vaillant- Carmanne, Liège,(1946). 449pp.

[8] Raucq P.. Note préliminaire sur le raccord des formations mésozoïque de la Luebo et de la région de DIBAYA (Kasaï, Congo belge)). Ann. Soc. Géol. Belg,1959. 82. B. 201-209pp.

[9] Duvigneaud P. & Leonard J. Cartes schématique des principaux aspects de la végétation du Congo belge- les naturalistes belges,(1953). 34, p3-4.

[10] Wagner, P.A.The diamond fied of Southern Africa, Transvaal, Johnnesbourg. (1914)

[11] Griffin, W.L. et Ryan, C.G.Trace elements in indicator minerals: area selection and target evaluation in diamond exploration, Elsevier, Journal of Geochemical Exploration,(1995). v53, 311-337.

[12] Gurney, J.J. Kimberlite occurrence and origin: a basis for conceptual models in exploration, The Univ. West. (1984)Aust, v8, pp. 143-166.

[13] Clement, C.R & Skinner E.M.W.Monticellite : An abundant Groundmass mineral in some kimnerlites, kimberlite symposium 1 : Cambridge (Extended abstracts), (1985).71-73

[14] Milashev, V.A. The term « Kimberlite » and classification of Kimberlite rocks, geol. Geofiz. 1963.4, 42-52.

[15] Schulze, D.J. A classification scheme for mantle-derived garnets in kimberlite: a tool for investigating the mantle and exploring for diamonds, Elsevier, Lithos, (2003). v71, 195-213.

[16] Fieremans. Contribution à l'étude pétrographique de la Brèche Kimberlitique de Batwanga, Institut Géologique De l’université, Louvain(1966),

[17] Dawson J.B. kimberlites and their xenoliths. Springer – Verlag, New-York,(1980).252pp.

Institut Géologique De l’université, Louvain,

[18] Meyer de Stadelhofen, C.les brèches kimbermitiques du territoire de Bakwanga (Congo), Archives des sciences de la société de physique et d’histoire naturelle de Génève, (1963). 16, 1, 87-143.

[19] Clément, C.R et al. kimberlite redefined.J.Geol., (1984). 32, 223 – 228.

[20] McCandless, T.E. et Gurney, J.J. Sodium in garnet and potassium in clinopyroxene: criteria for classifying mantle eclogites. In: J.R. Ross et al. (Editors), Kimberlites and Related Rocks Vol. 2: Their Crustal/Mantle Setting, Diamonds and Diamond Exploration. Geol. Soc. Aust. Spec. Publ. 14, Blackwell, (1989). 827-832.

[21] Field, M. et Scott Smith, B.H.. Textural and genetic classification schemes for kimberlites: a new perspective, International Kimberlite Conference, Extended Abstracts, (1998) 7(1), 214-216.

[22] Cibumba et Onya.Contribution à l’étude cartographique et pétrographique des mas-sifs kimberlitiques de Bakwanga et de Tshibue (Kasaï oriental/RDC). Mém. Licence. Fac. Sci-ences, Dep. Géosciences, UNIKIN(2010).inédit.

[23] Marchand, P. Caractérisation de deux intrusions kimberlitiques au témiscamingue, notre-dame-du-nord 1 et belleterre (bt 44) et de deux dykes ultra-mafiques des monts Torngat. Université Laval(2005).

[24] Griffin, W.L., Ryan, C.G., Gurney, S.S., Sobolev, N.V. et Win, T.T. Chromite macrocrysts in Kimberlites and Lamproites: Geochemistry and Origin, International Kimberlite Conference, Extended Abstracts, (1991). 5, 142-144.

[25] Nkere B.J. kimberlites, megacrysts and related xenocrysts from southern and central africa: geochemistry and petrology. Department of Geological Sciences, University of Cape Town. Thesis, (2018). 328p.